Texas Attorney General Files Court Brief In Support Of 9-Month-Old Girl Fighting For Life In Fort Worth

Austin York
November 22, 2019 - 4:02 pm
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

© Courtney Sacco/Caller-Times,


DALLAS (KRLD) - Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a court brief with the District Court of Tarrant County in support of a nine-month-old baby girl. She's fighting for her life after Cooks Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, denied the baby's mother's request to continue life-sustaining treatment for her.

Texas law currently allows a hospital's "ethics" committee to vote to remove life-sustaining treatment against a patient's wishes.

Dallas civil attorney Rogge Dunn who is not associated with the case says the hospital has several reasons to do so.

"When you have limited medical resources, should you give that to someone who cannot recover at the denial, if you will, of someone else who needs medical resources and can recover? So you have to pick and choose sometimes between patients," Dunn says.

Paxton says the physician's decision to end treatment directly violates the mother's request and her daughter's right to life. His full statement:

"One of the core principles provided by the United States Constitution is that no person should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. This unconstitutional statute infringes on patients' right to life and does not allow patients and their families sufficient notice and the opportunity to be heard before physicians override the rights of their patients. Patients must be heard and justly represented when determining their own medical treatment, especially when the decision to end treatment could end their life."

Currently, section 166.046 of the Texas Health and Safety Code states that a physician who decides that treatment is medically inappropriate - along with an ethics or medical committee that affirm the decision - is not required to provide life-sustaining treatment at the request of a patient or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the patient unless a court orders otherwise. The statute also fails to require that physicians provide an explanation of why they refused life-sustaining treatment, effectively allowing the government to deny an individual's right to his or her own life and to do so without due process.